"When Bill Nye uses the word “evolution” here, he is talking about the belief
in molecules-to-man change (e.g., reptiles changing into birds, or ape-like
creatures changing into man). Such a view relates to historical science and
involves beliefs about the past that can’t be observed—times when no human
witness was there. But putting “evolution” and technology like the Internet
together is ridiculous. The Internet involves observational (operational)
science—lab research in the field of physics, the use of computers and
programming done by intelligent human beings, etc...
... And to say (as most evolutionists falsely
claim) that the main idea in all of biology is evolution is also ridiculous.
Students would be much further ahead if they were just taught real biology
(such as the nature of cells, reproduction, mutations, and natural
selection—all of which creationists accept as sound science) without the
baggage of the false view of origins that detracts from this discipline...
Bill Nye then goes on and states, 'having a
generation of kids not believing in science is bad for the world.' However,
because of what he has previously stated, he is really saying that 'believing
in science' and believing in 'evolution' are the same! This is the way
unsuspecting kids are brainwashed to believe the lie of evolution in the public
school education system, science museums, and science programs on TV."
Ken Ham, founder of Answers in Genesis and the Creation Museum
Posts
