November 8, 2021
By Gary Bauer
A number of people who are closely following the investigation of Special Counsel John Durham are noting that he's pursuing two tracks in his slow, methodical work.
The first track involves tackling those connected to the Clinton political machine who implemented Hillary's plan to smear Donald Trump in a Russian collusion scam, thereby casting doubt on the legitimacy of the 2016 election and crippling his presidency. Sadly, the smear succeeded to a considerable extent.
The second and most important track involves individuals inside the Deep State. These individuals eagerly embraced the false collusion narrative even when the facts were obvious, and even after they had credible information that it was nothing more than a Hillary dirty trick.
The FBI interviewed Igor Danchenko in 2017 and he vehemently denied that his information was accurately reflected in the dossier. But lied to the FBI about his sources for the dossier – Clinton confidant Charles Dolan, Jr.
The CIA notified the FBI that it had evidence that some Russians were working with the Clinton campaign to smear Trump with false claims of collusion. But former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe said that the CIA notification went to Peter Strzok, who failed to act on it. Strzok, you may recall, was fired from the FBI for his blatant anti-Trump bias.
The FBI, knowing the dossier was fatally flawed, nonetheless used it before the FISA courts to monitor various people in the Trump Administration. All of this raises serious questions about other fired officials like Bruce Ohr, Andrew McCabe and James Comey.
By the way, don't forget that John Durham isn't the first special counsel to investigate the Russian collusion hoax. And that begs the question: Why didn't Special Counsel Robert Mueller uncover any of what John Durham has discovered?
I think we all know why. Robert Mueller was never in charge of his own investigation. That was obvious from his congressional testimony. The coverup here is huge!
This was the biggest dirty trick in the history of American politics. Years from now, political science students will be studying "Hillarygate" instead of Watergate. It deeply damaged one of the most consequential presidents in modern history, and it shattered the reputation of the FBI.
Meanwhile, many neo-con Never Trumpers are silent about the remarkable charges filed by Durham and what those charges suggest was done to destroy Donald Trump.
January 6th was a protest that got stupidly out of control. What the Deep State did in 2016 and throughout the entire Russian collusion hoax and Ukraine phone call impeachment hoax – yes, they're linked! – was nothing short of a coup attempt. That's the real threat to our constitutional Republic!
So, here's an interesting question: Will Durham, who's known for moving slowly and methodically, bring more astonishing indictments before next November's congressional election or during the 2024 presidential contest?
And where does Donald Trump go to get his reputation back from this disgusting smear that he was elected by colluding with the Russians, when it was Hillary Clinton who colluded with Russians?
Posts
