"These inconsistencies are so important and sufficiently abstruse that in our view EPA needs to make an independent analysis of the science of global warming rather than adopting the conclusions of the [UN International Panel on Climate Change] and CCSP without much more careful and independent EPA staff review than is evidenced by the Draft TSP… If their conclusions should be incorrect and EPA acts on them, it is EPA that will be blamed for inadequate research and understanding and reaching a possibly inaccurate determination of endangerment. Given the downward trend in temperatures in 1998 (which some think will continue until at least 2030) there is no particular reason to rush into decisions based on a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data."
Dr. Alan Carlin, who has put together one of the most comprehensive, compelling compilations that is out there on the dissenting scientific views against the science of "man-made" global warming
Dr. Alan Carlin, who has put together one of the most comprehensive, compelling compilations that is out there on the dissenting scientific views against the science of "man-made" global warming
Posts
