IRLI shows new state immigration law was contemplated by Congress |
WASHINGTON—The Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI) has filed a brief in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals defending Iowa's new immigration law, which has been the target of lawsuits brought by the Biden Administration and anti-borders activists.
Following the example of Texas, which in response to the border crisis passed a sweeping immigration law, Iowa recently passed a law that makes illegal reentry into the United States a state crime. Under the law, aliens found guilty of that crime may avoid jail time by agreeing to be taken out of the country by Iowa officials. The federal government, joined by anti-borders activist groups, claims the law is preempted by federal immigration law.
In its brief, IRLI makes a unique argument, showing that the law, far from being preempted, is actually contemplated by the federal government's own criminal reentry statute, which makes it a federal crime to reenter the country after having been removed—including having been removed by agreeing to removal in a state court.
"These are two more meritless lawsuits by an administration and its allies trying desperately to stop states from doing anything about a problem Biden steadfastly refuses to solve," said Dale L. Wilcox, executive director and general counsel of IRLI. "Far from being inconsistent with this state law, federal immigration law explicitly gives effect to state removal laws such as this. We hope our brief, by bringing this feature of federal immigration law to the court's attention, convinces the court to uphold Iowa's effort to defend itself."
The cases are Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice v. Bird, No. 24-2263, and United States v. Iowa, No. 24-2265 (Eighth Circuit). |
Posts
