Friday, May 31, 2024

Institute for Energy Research: 🔌 Solar is Not as Eco-Friendly as it Would Seem

Solar Power Depletes Farmlands of Rich Soil


Summary:
 
Solar energy is depleting farmlands of their rich soils in the U.S. Midwest. The solar industry is moving into the U.S. Midwest, drawn by cheaper land rents, access to electric transmission, massive federal and state incentives, and the region's wide-open fields. But Biden's renewable energy boom risks damaging some of America's richest soils in key farming states like Indiana. Reuters based the finding on an analysis of federal, state and local data, hundreds of pages of court records; and interviews with more than 100 energy and soil scientists, agricultural economists, farmers and farmland owners, and local, state and federal lawmakers.

Fast Facts:
  • Driven by subsidies, mandates and federal and state policies compelling the use of more renewable energy, solar energy facilities are now displacing farmland at an increasing rate.
  • While land leases generally offer protection for landowners so that farms can be reclaimed from the solar installations, in practice damage is already being done with remediation as long as 50 years in the future.
  • The target for solar operations is increasingly in the Midwest, where government handouts to solar allow them to pay more to rent land than the farmers providing food for the nation.

Office of U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn: The Blackburn Report

**Disclaimer: To comply with U.S. Senate Policy, the Blackburn Report will not be distributed again until August. **

Earlier this month, an illegal immigrant was charged with attempted kidnapping, sexual battery, public intoxication, and evading arrest after he followed a woman into a bathroom at an ice cream shop in Nashville and groped her. I led a letter with members of the Tennessee delegation to U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas demanding answers about the immigration status of 23-year-old Nelson Yovani Ortiz-Ramirez and why he was allowed to remain in the U.S. Sadly, this incident is only the latest in a series of unconscionable acts by illegal immigrants who have entered our country. If the Biden administration actually enforced our immigration laws, these heinous acts could have been prevented. I will never vote to make illegal immigration legal. 

The GOPAC Newsletter: 05.31.24

GOPAC's Mission Majority Celebrates Primary 

Election Victory in TX-12 Runoff

Arlington, VA – The GOPAC Election Fund congratulates Texas State Representative Craig Goldman on his primary victory last night in Texas's 12th Congressional District. 

"Together, we celebrate Craig Goldman's well-deserved victory. Throughout his tenure as a state legislator, Craig has shown outstanding leadership, upholding conservative principles and achieving significant results. GOPAC endorsed his campaign with great confidence, recognizing his steadfast dedication to our shared values," GOPAC Chairman David Avella proudly stated.

For more details on GOPAC's Mission Majority, please visit www.mission-majority.com

CEI: CEI’s The Surge

Fewer Memorial Day Gimmicks, More Oil Production Will Bring Down Gasoline Prices

The Biden administration treats high gasoline prices as a public relations problem rather than a real hardship for millions of Americans, hence the gimmicky announcement just before Memorial Day weekend of releasing gasoline from federal stockpiles in the Northeast.

At least the administration understands the law of supply and demand when it says putting more fuel on the market will reduce prices. But these stockpiles were designed for temporary emergencies – like Middle East turmoil or major storms – and are not nearly enough to help hard-pressed drivers very much or for very long. The total of 42 million gallons of gasoline to be released through July 4th may sound like a lot in
press releases, but Americans use 376 million gallons each and every day.

In fact, the recent history of releases from government stockpiles (usually oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve sites in Texas and Louisiana) has often left experts debating
how much, if any, prices moderated in response. In 2022, for example, the releases did not stop gasoline and diesel prices from reaching $5.00 per gallon in the summer of that year.  

The 42 million gallons of gasoline to be released pales in comparison to the lost potential from the Biden administration's opposition to oil leasing on federal lands, including Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). By some estimates, ANWR drilling could reach
880,000 barrels or more per day and stay productive for two decades. Since each barrel of oil can be refined into about 20 gallons of gasoline, the 42 million gallon release equates to no more than a few days' worth of peak production from ANWR. And ANWR is the largest, but far from the only potential source of oil on federal lands and offshore areas that is being placed off limits. And note, this would be new oil added to the market rather than previously produced oil that had been held in storage.

Doubtless, there will be future summers where gasoline prices are as high or higher than they are today. Eliminating the government obstacles to increased domestic oil production makes infinitely more sense than draining existing stockpiles in a futile attempt at a short-term price drop.

President, VCDL: VCDL Bullet Points May 2024


CALLING 911

What to Say When the Police Show Up

You might have been home when you were forced to protect your family from an intruder. Or you might have been getting into your car in the parking lot of a grocery store when an armed carjacker approached and forced you to draw your firearm. It doesn't matter where you were forced to defend yourself, the reality is, you had to, shots have been fired, and thank God you are the one still standing.

 

But your ordeal is far from over. Your first call needs to be to 911. Keep it short and to the point letting dispatch know you were the victim of a crime. Give them the address, a brief description of what happened, request medical assistance for yourself and your attacker and politely hang up.

 

Your next call is to your lawyer. You do have a lawyer right? Maybe through your connections at VCDL or services such as U.S. LawShield? Either way, if you carry a gun, this is something you need to carefully research and have a plan for. Because the next thing that is going to happen is you are going to be answering questions from the police, and no matter how in the right you may be, you're probably going to be going to the station with police. 

 

CALLING 911

 

"Keep things as static as you can until authorities arrive," is the advice Georgia attorney Matt Kilgo says. "Don't talk to anyone else that you don't want to become a possible witness. Control the narrative. Don't make more witnesses who may be un­predictable on the witness stand. Talk to your lawyer instead."

And no, don't drag any bodies inside the house or place a weapon closer to an incapacitated attacker, as some people jokingly suggest.

 

"I don't recommend touching the body at all," Kilgo advises. Disturbing evidence suggests guilt and heightens the chances of being charged with another crime. You'll make a mess of your floors as well as your case.

Some attorneys caution against giv­ing medical aid to the offender. First, because trying to resuscitate someone you just shot may cut against the claim that you felt threatened. But also, a sly prosecutor could suggest it shows consciousness of guilt. And from a practical standpoint, you never know if the perpetrator is alone or if there are others, so staying vigilant until police arrive is critical.

 

SILENCE IS GOLDEN 

 

It may not feel natural to call for help, and then fall completely silent as a 911 operator asks you for details. Police, when they arrive, might not be happy about it either, but that's not your problem. Your job is to look out for yourself, not them. You're protecting yourself from a future trial, and for that, silence never hurts and talking rarely helps.

 

There are many reasons for this.

 

First, because you can. Silence is an ironclad right recognized by the justice system as belonging to every potential defendant. You can't get in trouble for staying silent. Prosecutors can't even tell the jury you refused to talk.

 

Second, because silence is your first weapon in protecting yourself now that you will become embroiled in the justice system. It isn't sexy and doesn't come in blued finish or adjustable night sights, but it does provide the time every person needs to process such a traumatic situation and then go through the scenario first with their attorney to make sure their story is accurate and true to the details so the truth can be properly relayed.

Third, you know this from the crime shows, any statement you make can be used against you in court. That's es­pecially true right after events happen since people in general, certainly ju­ries, assume you're more truthful when you've had less time to concoct a story.

 

"The only thing you can do is make the facts worse," says Kilgo. "Silence will make them better. Don't speak in a way that undermines your actions. The only person you should speak to is the person who has your best interests at heart—your lawyer." Remember, your right to speak to an attorney and remain silent are not just for criminals. These rights are protected by the U.S. Constitution for everybody.

 

Fourth, because you are likely to make a mistake, and even an honest mistake could spell trouble for your court case.

 

"Adrenaline is not a truth serum," Kilgo adds. "In the heat of the moment, humans experience tunnel vision, memory occlusion and elevated vital signs." There's virtually zero chance your perception, memory and recall will all be intact and functional after the most savage and excitable mo­ments of your life.

 

CLOSING ARGUMENTS 

 

Even if you survive a deadly force encounter, the biggest fight of your life may still be ahead of you. Don't as­sume it won't happen to you, and don't assume your wellbeing is the priority for 911 operators, police, prosecutors, judges or jury. Yes, maybe you know your local sheriff and he's a good egg. But maybe it's also an election year and maybe you only get one vote.

 

In the end, there isn't a universal formula for what to do in a defensive shooting. If there was, you wouldn't need a lawyer. There's an infinite number of possibilities, and you can't what-if them all. Instead, stick to the general principles laid out in this article. Re-read it if you can and share it with members of your household. Train up like you would at the range.



  —David Burnett

Derrick Anderson for Congress: INVITATION: Meet Derrick Anderson in Spotsylvania County This Tuesday!

You're Invited!

Join former Special Forces Green Beret Derrick Anderson for the third meet and greet on his Homegrown Tour! It's this coming Tuesday at Belle Haven Farm in Spotsylvania County at 6:30 PM. Hear about Derrick's roots in the 7th Congressional District, his time in the military, and his conservative vision for the future of our great country. Sign up below!


Early voting is open - please go vote ASAP if you haven't already!

The Danbury Institute: President Trump receives guilty verdict

Jury convicts President Trump in trial designed to sideline him

  

On Thursday, May 30th, a New York jury convicted President Donald Trump on 34 counts in what the 45th president called a "rigged, disgraceful trial." Conservatives across the nation are highlighting tonight how the trial:

 

  • twisted legal theory beyond what is normal and even proper in instructing jurors

  • blurred the lines between state and federal issues

  • placed unacceptable gag orders on the president

  • forced him to go through trial in a far left-leaning jurisdiction with a demonstrably biased judge

  • threatens the rule of law and erodes respect for the justice system

 

Politicizing the justice system in this way leads the United States into dangerous territory.

 

Take a look below at what Christian leaders had to say about the verdict today.


Help us stand for liberty.

 

Our nation and our values are under attack. Help us fight back and preserve the United States for future generations. This is no small task, and it takes all of us engaged and working together.

National Federation of Republican Women: *NFRW Stands with President Trump*

A Message from the President

NFRW Stands with President Trump


The American system of justice has been grievously wounded with the jury verdicts in the New York criminal case against President Trump. Sadly, President Trump has been relentlessly targeted because of his unfailing courage in exposing corruption and the weakened principles of the American government. Thankfully, our justice system has a robust appeals process.

 

The National Federation of Republican Women will continue to stand by and support President Trump. We join Americans everywhere fighting to restore our justice system and government to the principles fought for by our founding fathers.


Julie Harris


Immigration Reform Law Institute: Victory! Judge Sides with IRLI in Pursuit of ‘Abolish ICE’ Founders’ Emails

Why is USCIS hiding correspondence with radical anti-borders activist?

WASHINGTON – The Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI) has achieved a victory in its attempt to obtain United States Citizenship and Immigration Services' (USCIS) emails with radical "Abolish ICE" founder Tania Mattos.

 

In February, the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) for the District of Columbia, a component of DOJ, acting as counsel for USCIS, filed a motion claiming IRLI's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, filed to compel production of the USCIS-Mattos emails, did not "reasonably describe" the records IRLI seeks and should therefore be dismissed.

 

IRLI contested the USAO's motion. And the judge hearing the matter has ruled in favor of IRLI, refusing to dismiss the case. IRLI may now continue seeking an order compelling USCIS to produce the requested records.

 

"This is a great day for transparency in government," said Dale L. Wilcox, executive director and general counsel of IRLI. "For too long the current administration has been allowing radical anti-borders activists to influence federal immigration policy. At the same time they have been trying to hide the details of their communications with these activists. We need to apply sunlight to these discussions and find out exactly who is making critical government decisions that affect us all."

 

According to Matt O'Brien, IRLI's director of investigations, "This ruling represents a significant victory for IRLI. USCIS appears to have adopted a policy of refusing to provide any information in response to FOIA requests – despite the fact that the FOIA statute clearly requires the government to be fully transparent whenever possible. The USAO attempted to defend USCIS's flawed policy and the judge saw through the agency's specious arguments."

 

The case is Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) v. USCIS, No. 23-cv-3429 (D.D.C.).

Team Parkinson: Scott Parkinson Announces 17-Day Tour Across Virginia

Today, Scott Parkinson announced a 17-Day, 70+ event tour  - Virginians For Victory - across Virginia as he fights to secure the Republican nomination for the United States Senate.

 

Scott Parkinson released the following statement:


"We are fired up and ready to win! Virginians are tired of the Biden/Kaine open border policies that have allowed for an illegal alien invasion and made us less safe. We need to fight back against Bidenomics to save the middle class and restore economic prosperity. And parents are reasserting our voices inside the classroom to defend children against indoctrination."

 

Event Schedule:

 

June 1 HAMPTON - State Convention - 10:00 AM to 2:30 PM
June 1 PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY - 6:00 PM- RSVP HERE
June 2 STAUNTON - 12:30 PM- RSVP HERE
June 2 ARLINGTON - 6:00 PM- RSVP HERE
June 3 ALEXANDRIA - 9:30 AM- RSVP HERE
June 3 FAIRFAX COUNTY -  12:00 PM- RSVP HERE
June 3 LOUDOUN COUNTY - 2:00 PM
June 3 PRINCE WILLIAM - 6:00 PM

June 3 FAIRFAX COUNTY - 8:00 PM
June 4 CULPEPPER - 9:30 AM
June 4 GOODCHLAND - 12:30 PM
June 4 FREDERICKSBURG - 3:00 PM
June 4 NEWPORT NEWS - 6:30 PM - 8:30 PM

June 4 NEWPORT NEWS - 8:45PM
June 5 BLACKSBURG - 9:00 AM
June 5 HILLSVILLE - 12:00 PM
June 5 SALEM - 3:30 PM
June 5 MARTINSVILLE - 6:00 PM
June 6 BEDFORD - 9:30 AM
June 6 FARMVILLE/PRINCE EDWARD - 12:00 PM
June 6 NORFOLK - 6-8PM
June 7 VIRGINIA BEACH - 9:30 AM
June 7 CHESAPEAKE - 12:00 PM
June 7 ARLINGTON - 9:00 PM
June 8 LOUISA - 9:00 AM
June 8 CAMPBELL COUNTY - 12:30 PM
June 8 CLARKSVILLE - 4:00 PM
June 8 SOUTH BOSTON - 6:00 PM
June 8 CHATHAM - 8:00 PM
June 9 POWHATAN - 12:00 PM
June 9 SCOTTSVILLE - 2:30 PM
June 9 NELSON - 4:00 PM
June 9 ALBEMARLE - 5:30 PM
June 10 HANOVER - 9:30 AM
June 10 ESSEX COUNTY - 12:00 PM
June 10 MECHANICSVILLE - 3:30 PM
June 10 RICHMOND CITY - 7-8pm
June 10 RICHMOND CITY - 8:30 PM
June 11 GLOUCESTER - 9:30 AM
June 11 VIRGINIA BEACH - 12:30 PM
June 11 SUFFOLK - 3:00 PM
June 11 WILLIAMSBURG - 6:30 PM
June 12 ARLINGTON - 9:00 AM
June 12 STAFFORD - 12:00 PM
June 12 PRINCE WILLIAM - WOODBRIDGE - 3:00 PM
June 12 FAIRFAX STATION - 9:00 PM
June 13 SHENANDOAH COUNTY - 9:30 AM
June 13 HARRISONBURG - 12:00 PM
June 13 STAUNTON - 2:30 PM
June 13 LEXINGTON - 5:00 PM
June 13 ROANOKE - 7:30 PM
June 14 WYTHEVILLE - 9:00 AM
June 14 GILES COUNTY - 11:00 AM
June 14 TAZEWELL COUNTY - 1:30 PM
June 14 RUSSELL COUNTY - 4:00 PM
June 14 WASHINGTON COUNTY - 6:00 PM
June 15 LYNCHBURG - 9:00 AM
June 15 AMHERST - 12:00 PM
June 15 ALBEMARLE - 3:00 PM
June 15 FAIRFAX - 6:00 PM
June 16 LOUDOUN COUNTY - 12:30 PM
June 16 PRINCE WILLIAM - 2:30 PM
June 16 CHESTERFIELD - 5:30 PM
June 17 VIRGINIA BEACH - 9:30 AM
June 17 YORK - 12:30 PM
June 17 HENRICO - 2:45 PM
June 17 FINAL RALLY - FAIRFAX COUNTY - 7:00 PM

 

*Schedule is subject to change. Please RSVP. Additional stops and locations may be added. 

 

Thomas D. Klingenstein: Two Presidents, Two Visions: Which Constitution Will Survive?

Only One Constitution Can Survive


The upcoming June 27 debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump is fascinating on several levels, even before it's happened. We have never before had a current president debate a former president. In addition, the debate is unusually early, and will be conducted without a live audience—two factors that, according to some analysts, reveal deep concerns among White House staff. If Biden flops, the speculation goes, Democrats might still have time to replace him on the ticket.


We've also never had a debate in which the two major candidates had a combined age of 158. Although both men have strong support among the most devoted voters in their base, some Americans are less than thrilled with these two "well-seasoned" options. Last week one of us saw a man at the gym wearing a t-shirt that said, "America 2024: Anyone Under 80." (Biden is 81; Trump is "only" 77.)


However similar they may be in age, Trump and Biden could hardly be more different in their attitudes and beliefs about the meaning of America and the state of the country. Some voters may be unhappy with their options, but there is no doubt the two candidates do represent a clear and dramatic choice. In fact, the divisions in our country have not been so stark since the Civil War. It is hard to see how the nation can continue to be split on so many fundamental questions of morality, culture, economics, and foreign policy.


If the United States is to remain peaceful and united, it seems that we must, as Lincoln once said, "become all one thing, or all the other."


Read More

Common Sense: Threshold Crossed — Paul Jacob on the conviction of Trump.

We've seen many sad days for our republic. But now the country has crossed a certain horrible threshold of banana-republic-hood.


Guided by a corrupt judge, a New York City jury has found former President Trump guilty of all 34 of the District Attorney Alvin Bragg's bogus charges. Something or other to do with Stormy Daniels, an alleged affair, paying off an extortionist, federal election laws, and bookkeeping.


With Trump targeted by so many show trials launched solely to punish his ascendancy and prevent his reelection, chances were that at least one of these elephantine efforts would extract a conviction. Even people lousy at darts hit the dartboard sooner or later if they throw a thousand darts.


As Katie Pavlich notes, during the trial prosecutors didn't "focus on proving the fraud charges" but on "hush-money payments" and "irrelevant salacious details of an alleged affair." Who needs a definable crime when Being Trump is

crime enough?


The verdict made one reader at Instapundit "realize just how dependent the Democrats have become on appearing legitimate. Where there is no substance, form must take precedence. [So we're] offered oppression as 'democracy' and Stalinist show trials as 'justice.'"


There are so many irregularities in the charges and the conduct of the trial that the verdict is bound to be overturned on appeal.


By some court. Somewhere. No?


But the damage has been done. The worst politicos and operators are now high-fiving each other, little caring about implications and long-range effects. As if they cannot see the next step. 


As if they cannot see they are behaving like the caciques of a

banana dictatorship.


This is Common Sense. I'm Paul Jacob.

LifeNews.com

Immigration Reform Law Institute: Are U.S. Constitutional Rights for the World?

IRLI shows court Haitian expulsions were constitutional

WASHINGTON—The Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI) has filed a brief in D.C. federal district court in a case in which Haitian nationals, in an amended complaint, claim that their Fifth Amendment rights to equal protection and to due process were violated when they were turned away at the border to protect the nation from the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

As IRLI shows in its brief supporting the federal government's motion to dismiss, the Haitians' case is notably weak. First, IRLI shows that it is well-established law that aliens who have never been admitted to our country, such as the plaintiffs here, do not have rights under our Constitution.

 

Second, even if they had such rights, the plaintiffs' claim that the Biden Administration expelled them pursuant to a "Haitian deterrence policy," in violation of their right to equal protection of the law, would founder because they fail to provide any evidence that such a policy actually exists. In fact, aliens entering the country unlawfully have been expelled without regard to nationality.

 

Third, the plaintiffs claim that the health-code expulsions violate their due-process right to apply for asylum and to receive statutory protections against being expelled to a country where they face either persecution on account of group membership or torture. Yet, as IRLI shows, none of the plaintiffs even claims that he was expelled to a country where he faced such threats, or that he tried to apply for asylum and was prevented from doing so.

 

"Anti-borders activists, once again, are pushing their idea that our Constitution was written for the world and everyone in it," said Dale L. Wilcox, executive director and general counsel of IRLI. "They want that to be the case, because then aliens can sue themselves into the country regardless of what laws we pass and try to enforce. In fact, of course, America, just like any other country, has an inherent right to decide who may enter the country from abroad and who may not, and we did not saddle ourselves with a Constitution that takes away this right. The Supreme Court has recognized this national right to self-determination again and again, and we hope the district court also acknowledges it, and dismisses this case."

 

The case is Haitian Bridge Alliance v. Biden, No. 1:21-cv-03317 (D.D.C.).

Jason Miyares: Read my statement on President Trump’s conviction

No one in America is above or beneath the law, and everyone has a right to a fair and impartial trial. 

 

To be clear:

 

The FEC declined to prosecute this case.

 

The US Attorney's Office declined to prosecute this case.

 

This case was moved forward by a far-left prosecutor who regularly refuses to prosecute violent criminals but chose to move forward because the defendant was named Donald Trump. 

 

America has the greatest justice system in the world – and that is partly because it has a robust appeals process. There is broad consensus that this case is riddled with potential reversible errors and should be appealed in an expedited manner and resolved as quickly as possible. 

 

In America, we don't seek to jail political opponents — we seek to defeat them at the ballot box.

 

Instead of donating to me, donate to President Trump. We must stand together. 

 

Thank you,

Jason Miyares

Virginia Attorney General

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Madison County Republican Committee: CALENDAR ANNOUNCEMENT


JUNE 18, 2024   DUAL PRIMARY  Hours:  6 a.m. – 7 p.m.

PURPOSE:  Selection of nominees to run for the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate

VOTERS:  All registered voters in Madison County

CHOOSE FROM: *7 House of Reps for Ds

*5 Senate candidates; 6 House candidates for Rs

 

WHERE:  Your regular precincts

RESULT:  The nominees you select will be the candidates running in the November 5 election

Note:  Early voting ends June 15th – two Saturdays – 6/8 and 6/15 Weekdays until the 15th

Request mail-in ballot until Friday June 7th (office open til 5)


The R's have both House and Senate potential candidates – in order as listed on the ballot:  


Senate – 

  • Hung Cao
  • Edward C. "Eddie" Garcia, Jr.
  • Jonathan W. Emord
  • C.L. "Chuck" Smith, Jr. 
  • Scott Thomas Parkinson


House of Reps: 

  • Jon P. Myers
  • Derrick M. Anderson
  • Cameron D. Hamilton
  • John Prabhudoss
  • Maria E. Martin 
  • Terris E. Todd.


For the D's, Senator Kaine is not challenged, so they have House only.  

Again in order:  Eugene S. Vindman; Brianna D. Sewell; Elizabeth R. Guzman; Carl B. Bedell; Cliff D. Heinzerl Margaret Angela Franklin; Andrea O. Bailey.

Thomas D. Klingenstein: As the Schools Go, So Goes the Nation

As the Schools Go, So Goes the Nation


The character of a regime will be determined by the education it provides to its citizens. This is why the capture of the universities has been so essential to the advance of the group quota regime. Yet conservative efforts to combat the woke domination in this field have been scattered and piecemeal, rarely countering the group quota regime on the fundamental questions. Pavlos Papadopoulos looks to John Adams and the early history of our republic for a comprehensive, alternative vision that will educate citizens prepared to defend and sustain the American regime.


Below is an excerpt from "As the Schools Go, So Goes the Nation."


Confronted by the manifold crises, dysfunctions, and corruptions of the contemporary university, conservatives have excelled at proposing, and adopting, highly-targeted solutions. Is the canon being deconstructed, or simply ignored? Set up an honors program, so students can still choose to study the classics. Are conservatives under-represented in the academy? Establish advocacy groups to promote "viewpoint diversity." Are left-wing students, faculty, and administrators invoking micro-aggressions and political correctness to silence or exclude speakers and teachers? Invoke, once more, the liberal principles of academic freedom, and pressure university administrators to secure them even for right-wing faculty.


Each of these responses is admirable in its intentions and beneficial in its effects. But they are all partial and reactive in nature. Even the most comprehensive and daunting efforts—establishing special institutes and programs, or founding entirely new colleges and universities—rarely challenge the fundamental assumptions of our present educational regime. They typically claim to be returning to the scholarly principles and practices of the very recent past (a decade or two ago), and promise, this time, we won't slip back down the slope.


Even if we continue to pursue piecemeal reforms, we must be clear about the assumptions of our educational regime—and what the alternatives might be.

Read More

Join the fight.